Legal Opinion

Caparco v. Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises out of a controversy between county and municipal governments concerning the administration of civil service in the City of Rochester. It began by the institution of an article 78 (Civ. Prac. Act) proceeding by which the petitioners-appellants, who constituted the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of Rochester, sought an order “ (a) annulling and setting aside the determination made by the respondent, the State Civil Service Commission, in which said *214respondent refused to accept for approval or disapproval the Rules of the Municipal Civil Service Commission of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adler v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Matter of McCabe v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Admiral Realty Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Robertson v. ZimmermannNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Bareham v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis Construction Corp. v. County of SuffolkNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In re the Arbitration between Dutchess County Chapter, Civil Service Employees Ass'n & Dutchess CountyNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Buono v. BahouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Urban League of Rochester, New York, Inc. v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API