Legal Opinion
United States v. Donald Eddie Moody, United States of America v. Howard George Hollenbeck
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 6, 1986No. 84-5379, 84-5380PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
The opinion, 778 F.2d 1380 (9th Cir.1985), is amended at 1385 to add the following footnote 1, with a signal after the citation to United States v. Gann.
1. Trenouth v. United States, 764 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1985) (Trenouth), which was decided between Gann and Stewart, is not to the contrary. De novo review may be appropriate where, as in Trenouth, the issue is whether or not the alleged motivation for prosecution was legally permissible. The claims in Trenouth involved first amendment issues relating to the scope of the public forum doctrine and the right to picket on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Donald Eddie Moody, United States of America v. Howard George HollenbeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Martin E. Trenouth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by31 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Jose Arambula-RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Cyril T. HannaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.