Legal Opinion
United States v. Donald Eddie Moody, United States of America v. Howard George Hollenbeck
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 6, 1986No. 84-5379, 84-5380PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Moody and Hollenbeck appeal their convictions for conspiracy to import a controlled substance, conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute, and conspiracy to travel in foreign commerce in aid of racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1952(a)(3) and 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 963. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Moody and Hollenbeck argue on appeal that testimony of a coconspirator was improperly admitted, that portions of the grand jury testimony of several trial witnesses were improperly withheld from them in violation of the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Stanley Williams v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison, San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Nile SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.