Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burnside v. Gate City Steel Corp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1987No. 16300Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

The majority opinion, without so much as a “by your leave, sir,” endorses a state agency acting beyond the authority granted to it by our legislature. The areas in which the Department of Employment has taken unto itself more power than that delegated to it are the following:

1. The Department had absolutely no authority to order a refund of the alleged over-payments rather than deduct the over-payments from future benefits pursuant to I.C. § 72-1369(a)(2)(A).

2. The Department lacked authority to condition Burnside’s eligibility for benefits upon its eligibility review agreement.

A third…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Guillard v. Department of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Claim of SappIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Davenport v. STATE, DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENTIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Small v. Jacklin Seed Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API