Thomas Kernick v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal in forma pauperis from a judgment and sentence the legality of which is challenged upon the sole ground that the evidence which resulted in the conviction of the defendant (appellant) was procured through an illegal search and seizure and should have been suppressed.
Under the first count of a two-count indictment, the defendant was charged with having on June 17, 1956, at Kansas City, Missouri, facilitated the transportation, concealment and sale of heroin hydrochloride, knowing it to have been unlawfully imported into the United States. 21 U.S.C.A. §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Raymond Ralph Roberts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- John Paul Schook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Pardo-BollandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Louis Clifton Hess, Donald Kilsmuth Hess and Lewis Milton Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Max B. Leffler v. United States of America, Clifford William Close v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.