Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

I-S-M

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided June 4, 2026No. ID 4228Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

29 I&N Dec. 811

(BIA 2026) Interim Decision #4228 Matter of I-S-M-, Respondent Decided June 4, 2026 1 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The Immigration Judge properly found the respondent not credible, and ultimately ineligible for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture, due to various inconsistencies related to the respondent’s identity. FOR THE RESPONDENT: Pro se BEFORE: Board Panel: OWEN and GALLOW, Appellate Immigration Judges; WANG, Temporary Appellate Immigration Judge. OWEN,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jamal Ali Farah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Arteaga v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Almaghzar v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. J-Y-CBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API