Legal Opinion
Almaghzar v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 2006No. 04-35863PublishedCited by 168 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Respondent’s Unopposed Request for Modification of the Decision is GRANTED. The opinion filed on June 8, 2006, and published at 450 F.3d 415 (9th Cir.2006), is AMENDED as follows.
On page 422 of the opinion, the first paragraph under the subheading “B. The Merits of Almaghzar’s CAT Claim” begins as follows:
To receive the protection of the CAT, an alien must prove that it is more likely than not that the alien would be tortured if removed. 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c)(2). An alien must establish that he or she would be tortured on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gil Ilano Colmenar,petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Todor Krumov Simeonov v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- Shrestha v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Wang v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Cole v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Lianhua Jiang v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Rita Carrion Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.