Legal Opinion

Crowell v. Young

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory

Decided October 4, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the United States Court for the Northern District. W. M. Springer, Judge, Suit to foreclose a mortgage by F. M. Crowell and another against J. W. Young and others. Decree sustains a demurrer to complaint. Plaintiff appeal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the United States Court for the Northern District. W. M. Springer, Judge, Suit to foreclose a mortgage by F. M. Crowell and another against J. W. Young and others. Decree sustains a demurrer to complaint. Plaintiff appeal. The appellants' complaint in equity alleges that the defendants (appellees here) and plaintiff Crowell are Cherokee Indians, and that the plaintiff Blevins is a citizen of the United States; that on the 13th day of September, 1895, the defendants, being indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of $1,677.50, executed to plaintiffs their promissory note for that sufrí,…

1Opinion of the CourtClayton, J.

The court below entertained the opinion that a Cherokee Indian could not execute a valid mortgage to a citizen of the United States upon his premises located in the Cherokee Nation, and as the plaintiff Blevins, one of the mortga*39gees named in the mortgage, was a white man, held, therefore, the mortgage to be void. And this is the only question of dispute in the case.

The constitution of the Cherokee Nation provides: “The lands of the Cherokee Nation shall remain common property; but the improvements made thereon, and' in the possession of the citizens of the nation, are the exclusive and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dowell v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Hannah v. CarringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
  3. In re GraysonCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hampton v. MaysCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API