Hampton v. Mays
Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory
Appeal from the United States Court for the Southern District. Hosea Townsend, Judge. Proceedings by Mays & Williams and another against Wade Hampton and others. From an adverse order, the latter parties appeal.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the United States Court for the Southern District. Hosea Townsend, Judge. Proceedings by Mays & Williams and another against Wade Hampton and others. From an adverse order, the latter parties appeal. The proceedings in this case were commenced by the bringing of a suit in the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory (Judge Townsend presiding) by the appellees Mays & Williams against the appellant Wade Hampton upon a promissory note of $1125, the purchase price of ah improvement on Indian lands. Hampton, the defendant, in the suit, was a white man. The…
1Opinion of the CourtClayton, J.
The appellants’ assignment of error is as follows: “The court erred: First, in overruling the objections' of the appellants to the confirmation of sale; second, in granting appellee’s motion for the writ of assistance; third, in issuing the writ of assistance; fourth, in overruling the appellants’ hnotion to vacate the order granting the writ of assistance.” As the appellant’s brief is short and concise, for the purpose of more fully showing, than is done by the specifications of error, the exact questions raised in the case, we will set it out in full. It is as follows: “Appellants’…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mays v. FriebergCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1899
- Crowell v. YoungCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1901