Legal Opinion

David Ibragimov v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 25, 2007No. Docket 05-4771-agPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge.

We consider here the claims of a petitioner who all but concedes that he has no legal right to remain in the United States, but who argues that his removal proceedings were invalid because the charges brought against him did not reflect his proper status, which he claims was merely that of an illegal “visa overstay.” 1 In particular, we consider whether petitioner, who remained in the United States after the expiration of his B-2 visa, 2 and subsequently left and returned to the country pursuant to the government’s grant of “advance parole” 3 while his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Alexander Twum v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Leng May Ma v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Yu Sheng Zhang v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Mufied v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. BaldeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  3. Jamal A. v. WhitakerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  4. Cruz-Miguel v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Gertsenshteyn v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API