State v. Clark

Defendant appeals from a jury verdict and judgment finding him guilty of eight counts of sexual intercourse without consent. We affirm the jury verdict and the judgment of the District Court.

The issues on appeal are:(1) Did the trial court err in allowing the defendant to be charged and tried on the amended information?(2) Did the trial court err in excluding opinion testimony of defendant’s professional investigator?(3) Was the State’s cross-examination of defendant’s character witness, Larry Simpson, improper?(4) Did the State improperly impeach defendant’s testimony by using irrelevant,…