Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Silk Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 16, 1941No. 7806PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

Early in 1936 the petitioner, a manufacturer with its principal office at Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, and with another office in New York City, made an application for a loan from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. On March 25, 1936, the bank wrote a letter to the petitioner stating that it had approved a loan to the petitioner subject to a number of conditions. Some of these conditions plainly were to be fulfilled before the loan was made; some, imposed duties upon the taxpayer to be performed by it after the consummation of the loan. The loan was to be secured by a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Florence Cotton Mills v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  2. Commissioner v. Haskelite Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  3. American Liberty Pipe Line Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. Rahr Malting Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1944
  5. Rahr Malting Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API