Bethlehem Silk Co. v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
Early in 1936 the petitioner, a manufacturer with its principal office at Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, and with another office in New York City, made an application for a loan from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. On March 25, 1936, the bank wrote a letter to the petitioner stating that it had approved a loan to the petitioner subject to a number of conditions. Some of these conditions plainly were to be fulfilled before the loan was made; some, imposed duties upon the taxpayer to be performed by it after the consummation of the loan. The loan was to be secured by a…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Florence Cotton Mills v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Commissioner v. Haskelite Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- American Liberty Pipe Line Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Rahr Malting Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1944
- Rahr Malting Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944