Legal Opinion

Florence Cotton Mills v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 24, 1942No. 10091PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Florence Cotton Mills, with reference to the surtax on undistributed profits earned in its fiscal year ending August 31, 1937, claimed a credit under Sect. 26(c) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. Int. Rev. Acts, page 836, because it could not have distributed its profits without violating a written contract with Reconstruction Finance Corporation, which contract was asserted to have been executed by the taxpayer prior to May 1, 1936. This claim was denied by the Commissioner, and his decision was upheld by the Board of Tax Appeals.

The taxpayer on July 2, 1935,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Morgan Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  3. Bethlehem Silk Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atlantic Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  2. Commissioner v. Haskelite Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  3. American Liberty Pipe Line Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. Houston Cotton Exchange Bldg. Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  5. Rahr Malting Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API