Legal Opinion

In re Scott

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 2003No. B166178PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

Noel Phillipe Scott challenges a disciplinary loss of 30 days of conduct credits on the ground the record does not support the finding that his conduct constituted a serious rules violation under regulations adopted by the Department of Corrections (CDC). Petitioner, a state prison inmate, was properly disciplined for an act of disrespect to prison staff. Ordinarily, this would be an offense subject to “administrative” discipline. It was treated as a more serious offense under a rule applying to “a repeated pattern of administrative rule violations for the same offense.”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Brewer v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. In Re CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. MODERN PAINT & BODY SUPPLY, INC. v. State Bd. of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. In Re LuseroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re DikesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. In Re PlayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. (PC) Denton v. BibbsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PC) Denton v. BibbsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API