In re Scott
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J.
Noel Phillipe Scott challenges a disciplinary loss of 30 days of conduct credits on the ground the record does not support the finding that his conduct constituted a serious rules violation under regulations adopted by the Department of Corrections (CDC). Petitioner, a state prison inmate, was properly disciplined for an act of disrespect to prison staff. Ordinarily, this would be an offense subject to “administrative” discipline. It was treated as a more serious offense under a rule applying to “a repeated pattern of administrative rule violations for the same offense.”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brewer v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- In Re CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- MODERN PAINT & BODY SUPPLY, INC. v. State Bd. of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re LuseroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re DikesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- In Re PlayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- (PC) Denton v. BibbsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Denton v. BibbsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025