Legal Opinion

Menifee v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1993No. 48A05-9201-CR-11PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

CONOVER, Judge.

Steven R. Menifee petitions for rehearing asserting we erred in affirming the trial court’s re-institution of sentences after his probation violations, 600 N.E.2d 967. Menifee specifically contends we did not follow Reffett v. State (1991), Ind., 571 N.E.2d 1227, and did not recognize he had a “contract” with the trial court which limited his sentence to 5V2 years instead of the 15V2 year sentence originally and subsequently imposed.

We disagree with both of Menifee’s contentions. However, we will discuss these contentions to clarify our original opinion.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reffett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. United States v. Thomas Joseph Reardon, A/K/A T.J. ReardonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. Menifee v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Spivey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Braxton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Brooks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Wilburn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API