Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Carr
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1977No. 11609 and 12113PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
These consolidated appeals arise out of a claim for increased child support on behalf of the minor children of the parties. Appellant challenges in No. 11609 the order of the trial court dismissing for lack of jurisdiction her motion for increased child support. In No. 12113, she assigns as error the dismissal of her complaint for increased support on the ground of forum non con-veniens. A brief recital of the facts is necessary to place these appeals in proper perspective.
In November 1973, the parties entered into a separation and property settlement agreement which provided, inter alia, for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frost v. PEOPLES DRUG STORE, INCORPORATEDDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Carr v. Bio-Medical Applications of Washington, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Wilburn v. WilburnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Melvin v. MelvinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Curley v. CurleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mills v. Aetna Fire Underwriters InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Washington v. May Department StoresDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Forgotson v. SheaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Asch v. TaveresDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Stevens v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.