Goldberg Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The decision upon which thé judgment appealed from rests is predicated upon the law as applied by the learned referee in Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of U. S. (144 Misc. 363), the appeal from which is decided herewith (238 App. Div. 696). Our decision therein adopts the findings and conclusions of the referee so far as material to sustain the decision herein.
It follows, therefore, that the judgment appealed from should be in all respects affirmed, without costs.
Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ. McAvoy, J., taking no part.
Judgment so far as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1932
- Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- Van der Stegen v. Neuss, Hesslein & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Van der Stegen v. Neuss, Hesslein & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934