Legal Opinion

Goldberg Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The decision upon which thé judgment appealed from rests is predicated upon the law as applied by the learned referee in Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of U. S. (144 Misc. 363), the appeal from which is decided herewith (238 App. Div. 696). Our decision therein adopts the findings and conclusions of the referee so far as material to sustain the decision herein.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment appealed from should be in all respects affirmed, without costs.

Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ. McAvoy, J., taking no part.

Judgment so far as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van der Stegen v. Neuss, Hesslein & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Van der Stegen v. Neuss, Hesslein & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API