Legal Opinion

Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Bonnell

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 15, 1878PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Bill for a foreclosure; brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County. Facts found by a committee, and decree of foreclosure passed by Hovey, J. Motion in error by respondents. The case is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

On the 27tli day of February, 1867, Thompson & Co., owning a tract of land in Bridgeport divided into three lots, which have been designated as P, R, and S, mortgaged S to P. T. Barnum for $15,000. On April 17tli, 1869, Black, Wilson & Co., who had become the owners of the land, mortgaged P and R to the same person for $9,000; on May 20th, 1869, mortgaged R and 8 to the Delaware & Hudson Canal Company, the petitioners, for $40,000; and on October 4th, 1870, mortgaged R and S to Bonnell, the respondent, for $7,000. In June, 1872, the title of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Company to R and S…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Overholser v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Lockwood v. SturdevantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
  3. Maraman v. TrunnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  4. Waterman v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
  5. Lord v. SillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1854

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Feeney Tool Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API