Maraman v. Trunnell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 37 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEALS FROM BULLITT CIRCUIT COURT. cited Rev. Statute, chap. 37, art. 1, sec. 18 ; 3 Man., 353 ; 5 Man., 19 ; l Met., 51.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stites
As those appeals involve the same question, and are between the same parties, they will be considered and disposed of together.
In 1857 Henry O. Maraman made several promissory notes, payable to ‘'James Caldwell, administrator of F. Maraman. deceased.” Caldwell died without collecting the notes, or fully administering upon the estate of his intestate. By an order of the Bullitt county court, the estate of F. Maraman, deceased, not administered, was committed to the charge oí Trunnell, the sheriff of said county, as administrator de bonis non, and the said notes having come to his hands as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williams v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1840
3Cited by19 opinions
- Freeland v. FreelandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Fulton v. TeagerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Knoop v. KelseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Cowles v. DickinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Brown v. SnellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1859
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.