Legal Opinion

Wright v. N.E. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Boston

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 10, 1932No. 13365PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

G. B. GrEEnE, Circuit Judge, Acting Associate Justice.

The complaint in this action was evidently modeled after the complaint in the case of Williams v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Company, 105 S. C., 305, 89 S. E., 675, in which case this Court held that the complaint contained allegations appropriate to two causes of action, one arising ex contractu, and the other ex delicto. Within due time after the service of the summons and complaint herein, the defendant gave notice of a motion to require plaintiff to elect between the two alleged causes of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Philadelphia Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  2. Galphin v. Pioneer Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Welch v. Life Ins. Co. of Va.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  4. Williams v. Philadelphia L. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  5. Wood v. Southeastern Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Welch v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  2. Lawrimore v. American Health & Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Meadows v. Peoples Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Susoni Viuda de O'Neill v. Pacific Woodmen Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
  5. Lemons v. Pilot Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API