Legal Opinion

Neeb v. Jacobson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1929No. Docket No. 166, Calendar No. 33,857PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for damages for injuries resulting from hitting her with his automobile. There was judgment for defendant on directed verdict, and plaintiff brings error.

Plaintiff charges she was injured while crossing East Forest avenue in Muskegon, by defendant operating a Hudson sedan at an excessive rate of speed, without brakés and without lights, off the traveled portion of the highway, without his car being under control. Plaintiff claims she was in the exercise of due care and caution and without fault or negligence. The injury is alleged to have occurred October 23, 1926.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bedell v. BerkeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Larned v. VanderlindeMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hutchins v. Priestly Express Wagon & Sleigh Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Schock v. CoolingMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Steger v. ImmenMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cotten v. StolleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Carey v. De RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Moore v. NoorthoekMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Tio v. MolterMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Haley v. Grosse Ile Rapid Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API