Legal Opinion
Anstine & Musgrove, Inc. v. Calcasieu Refining Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 8, 2010No. 10-1173-JWLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
In this action, 54 plaintiffs assert state-law claims against 17 defendants who allegedly purchased plaintiffs’ oil and gas from intermediaries who then declared bankruptcy. Plaintiffs brought the suit in the District Court of Pratt County, Kansas, and 15 of the defendants subsequently removed the case to this Court under the bankruptcy removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1452. Defendants Cimarron Transportation, LLC (“CT”) and Crude Marketing & Transportation, Inc. (“CMT”) did not join in the removal and have not appeared in this action.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ramiro Arango and Gabriella Arango, Individually, Etc., Plaintiffs v. Guzman Travel Advisors Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- John Doe, Father of John Doe and Mother of John Doe v. Robert I. Kerwood, D.O.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKinstry v. SergentDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
- HARRELL v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Magana v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024