Legal Opinion

State v. Sexton

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 8, 2016No. 20151069-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision

ROTH, Judge:

¶1 Nathan Sexton appeals his sentences for possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia, both class B misdemeanors. Sexton contends that the district court abused its discretion when it ordered that his sentences be served consecutively to the prison sentence he was already serving. We affirm.

¶2 In May 2015, while on probation 1 and in treatment for drug addiction at the Northern Utah Community Correctional Center (NUCCC), Sexton was caught with “spice,” a controlled substance, in his room. Based on this incident, Sexton’s probation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. KillpackUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. HelmsUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. WoodlandUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. BunkerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API