Legal Opinion
City of Colorado Springs v. Grueskin
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 19, 1966No. 21669Published
1Opinion of the Court
422 P.2d 384 (1966)
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Harold GRUESKIN and Dividend Automotive Equipment Company, Defendants in Error.
No. 21669.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
December 19, 1966.
Rehearing Denied January 23, 1967.
F. T. Henry, Colorado Springs, for plaintiff in error.
Dale L. Holst, Donald E. La Mora, Colorado Springs, for defendants in error.
Donaldson, Hoffman & Goldstein, Denver, A Professional Corporation, amicus curiae.
A. T. Smith, Denver, Gordon H. Mayberry, Houston, Tex., William S. Livingston, Denver, amici curiae.
MOORE, Justice.
Two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- City and County of Denver v. Denver Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- City of Colorado Springs v. GrueskinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- City of Marysville v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Independent Dairymen's Ass'n v. DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.