Yates v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). It is earnestly insisted that the evidence is hot .sufficient to warrant the verdict. The evidence shows 'that' the plaintiffs lived in rented houses, and that the servants of the railroad company began to burn the carcasses .on Sunday morning and continued to burn them until late the following Wednesday evening. The wind, for the most part, was blowing in the direction of the plaintiffs ’ houses, and caused them and their families extreme discomfort, and 'also made them sick to a certain extent.
It is true that our statute provides that, when any horse,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Daniel v. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1903
- Pierce v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Junction City Lumber Co. v. SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Humphrey v. HavensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Murphy v. CuppSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Bickley v. Morgan Utilities Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- International Shoe Company v. GibbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Ayer-Lord Tie Company v. PuckettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Bryson v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.