Legal Opinion

Barney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 13, 1994No. 93-02993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FULMER, Judge.

Eric Stearns Barney appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief asserting six grounds for reversal. Barney’s allegation that his plea was not voluntarily entered may have merit. We reverse and remand for further proceedings as to this issue only.

Barney claims that he entered his plea based upon trial counsel’s erroneous advice that sentencing as a habitual felony offender is mandatory. In light of the recent supreme court ruling that habitual felony offender sentencing is not mandatory, Burdick v. State, 594 So.2d 267 (Fla.1992), Barney claims that he was misled…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burdick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Shell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Drymon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API