Legal Opinion

United States v. Florencio Rosales-Mireles

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 6, 2017No. 16-50151PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Florencio Rosales-Mireles appeals his sentence for illegal reentry. He contends that the district court erred by counting one of his prior convictions twice when calculating the sentencing-guideline range. He also maintains that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

I

Rosales-Mireles pleaded guilty of illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). When calculating the criminal-history score, the probation officer counted a 2009 Texas conviction of misdemeanor assault twice, assessing two criminal-history…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. United States v. CooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. PeltierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rosales-Mireles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. United States v. Yudeluis Jimenez-ElvirezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Roberto TorresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Jose Reyes-OchoaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Rafael MarroquinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API