Van Epps v. Redfield
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Shit praying that the title to certain real estate might be vested in the plaintiff, brought to the Superior Court iu Hartford County and tried to the court, George W. Wheeler, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, and appeal hy the defendants for alleged errors in “the rulings of the court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtFern, J.
The present action was before this court on demurrer to the complaint, upon the plaintiff’s appeal, at a former session. Van Epps v. Redfield, Admr., et al., 68 Conn. 39. It was sent back for trial to the Superior Court, *107which, upon hearing, rendered judgment for the plaintiff, and now the defendant has appealed.
The suit was brought to compel the specific performance of an oral agreement relating to real estate. Concerning said agreement, the finding is that John C. Wasserbach, the defendant’s testator, resided in Hartford, in 1875, and there became acquainted with the plaintiff. In 1877 an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Van Epps v. RedfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- ConeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
3Cited by24 opinions
- Burns v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Woolley v. . StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Santoro v. MackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.