Moreta v. Cestero
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Marcy S. Friedman, J.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioners Martha Moreta and her daughter, Johanna Moreta, challenge respondents’ termination of a Section 8 rent subsidy or voucher for apartment D19D at 3333 Broadway in Manhattan (subject apartment), in which they resided together until Martha’s vacatur. Petitioner Johanna Moreta claims entitlement to the subsidy as a remaining family member. Respondents oppose the petition on the ground that petitioners failed to exhaust administrative remedies and, in the alternative, on the merits.
The undisputed facts are as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Rochester Pure Waters DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Arrocha v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.