Legal Opinion

Romer v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 3, 1963No. 14180_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

317 F.2d 919

James ROMER, an Infant, by His Next Friend, John Romer and

John Romer and Mary Romer, Appellants,

v.

Claude Rodgers BALDWIN and Smith's Transfer Corporation of

Staunton, Virginia.

No. 14180.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 19, 1963.

Decided May 7, 1963, Rehearing Denied June 3, 1963.

Theodore R. Mann, Narin, Garfinkel & Mann, Philadelphia, Pa. (Stephen B. Narin, Marvin Garfinkel, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

George P. Williams, III, Schnader Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa. (Edward C. German, LaBrum & Doak, Philadelphia, Pa., on the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Eleanor B. Halprin, Administratrix of the Estate of Lawrence W. Halprin, Deceased v. Andre Mora, and Third-Party Clarence W. Davis, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Thompson v. CampCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  4. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. KulpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  5. Romer v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pryer v. SlavicCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. US Airways, Inc., for American v. Sabre Holdings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API