Legal Opinion

Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Kulp

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1939No. 11245PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

Appellee herein, plaintiff below, sued as administrator to recover damages for the death of Harry Rice Kulp, sustained while in the employ, as a freight brakeman, of the above named appellant railway company, generally referred to as the “Omaha”. In this opinion the parties will be designated as in the trial court.

This is the second time this case has appeared before us on appeal. On the former trial, at the conclusion of all the evidence, the district court sustained the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the ground that the evidence was insufficient…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Thompson v. Maxwell Land Grant & Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. Rosa Lee Leaman RoosthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. Michael Rudy ThamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Christie v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. Laurice v. Cox v. Esso Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API