United States v. Donald W. Streck
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Donald W. Streck appeals the district court’s order, entered on remand from this court, finding that the government did not rely upon immunized testimony in obtaining an indictment against Streck for tax evasion. Upon review, we affirm.
I
From 1983 to 1985, Streck was an independent contractor in the trucking industry. Among his clients were a number of entities owned by Frank Walsh. In 1983, Streck began diverting funds from various Walsh entities into a bank account held by American Carriers, Inc. (“ACI”), a corporation owned and controlled by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Gordon PennellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- David ARCHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MACOMB COUNTY BANK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Michael BartelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Hazelwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1996
- United States v. Michael BartelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994