Legal Opinion
In re Admiral Container Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 27, 1951No. Bankr. No. 332-50PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
Doris Z. Dodd, a creditor, objecting to confirmation of a plan of arrangement under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 701 et seq., seeks a review *725of the referee’s determination. The principal grounds on which it is alleged that the referee erred are:
1. The plan is not for the ¡best interests of the creditors.
2. The plan is not fair, equitable and feasible.
3. The debtor was guilty of acts which would bar its discharge under the Bankruptcy Act.
These assignments of error will be discussed in inverse order. The third ground, namely that the debtor was guilty…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mecca Temple of Ancient Arabic Order of Nobles of Mystic Shrine v. DarrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- In Re Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Lurie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Record Club of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- In Re Slumberland Bedding Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1953
- In the Matter of Admiral Container Corporation, Debtor. Doris Z. Dodd, a CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Bramblett v. Commonwealth of KentuckyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022