Legal Opinion
Building Industry Legal Defense Foundation v. Norton
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 28, 2003No. 3:01-cv-02101Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
GONZALEZ, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is plaintiff Building Industry Legal Defense Foundation’s (“BILD”) motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. BILD’s costs have already been taxed against defendants by order of the Clerk of the Court on February 12, 2003. This Order will accordingly only address the portion of BILD’s motion seeking attorneys’ fees. For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies BILD’s motion.
BACKGROUND
On November 15, 2001, the Center for Biological Diversity and California Native Plant Society (collectively,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Davis, a Municipal Corporation v. William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Douglas County v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.