Legal Opinion
Keller Ex Rel. 501 South Cherry Joint Venture v. Millice
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided November 29, 1993No. Civ. A. H-92-3140PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STACY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court are three motions made by Carl T. Millice, Defendant. The first is a motion to dismiss or' transfer venue under Rule 12(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure due to improper venue (Instrument No. 3). The second is a motion to dismiss with prejudice or transfer venue on the basis of forum non conveniens (instrument No. 4). The third is a motion to dismiss or transfer venue under Rule 12(b)(1) due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Instrument No. 3).
On February 19,1993, the parties consented to trial…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trutec Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Western Atlas International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Hallaba v. Worldcom Network Services Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2000
- Kerns v. KernsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Cage v. GDH International, Inc. (In re Great Gulfcan Energy Texas, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Libersat v. Sundance Energy IncDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.