Legal Opinion
Krodel v. Bayer Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 19, 2004No. CIV.A. 03-11109-NMGPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
In the present dispute, Plaintiff, Dr. Louis F. Krodel (“Dr.Krodel”), alleges that Defendant, Bayer Corporation (“Bayer”), acting in its role as Plan Administrator of the Bayer Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan (“The Plan”), wrongfully denied him certain health benefits to which he is entitled. Plaintiff and Defendants have filed cross motions for summary judgment.
I. Factual Background
The following facts are taken from Plaintiffs Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (Docket No. 31), Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs Statement of Undisputed Material…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Patrick J. O'COnnOr v. Robert W. SteevesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stanford v. Continental Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006