Legal Opinion
Barimany v. Urban Pace LLC
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 1, 2013No. 12-CV-982PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERLY, Associate Judge:
Appellants Rachelle Barimany and Erik Dove appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their tort action against Appellee Urban Pace LLC (“Urban Pace”) for wrongful involvement in litigation. They argue that the trial court improperly applied Virginia law instead of District of Columbia law; alternatively, they argue that, even if Virginia law (specifically the Virginia Condominium Act, Va.Code Ann. §§ 55-79.39 to -79.103 (2010)) applied, it did not immunize Urban Pace from liability. We need not determine whether the trial court properly looked to Virginia law to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thuneibat v. Syrian Arab RepublicDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- A Love of Food I, LLC v. Maoz Vegetarian USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Price v. Stryker CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Barry v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Corporate Accountability Lab v. Sambazon, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.