Legal Opinion

State v. Hurst

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 2018No. CA2017–05–077PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtS. Powell, J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals the decision of the Warren County Court of Common Pleas granting defendant-appellee, Ashley N. Hurst, 17 days of jail-time credit for the time she *1008spent on electronically monitored house arrest ("EMHA") in accordance with this court's prior decision in State v. Fillinger , 12th Dist. Madison No. CA2016-04-015, 72 N.E.3d 671, 2016-Ohio-8455. For the reasons outlined below, we reverse the trial court's decision and remand for further proceedings.

Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} On January 17, 2017, the Warren County Grand Jury returned an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. DickinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. NapierOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. NagleOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. BlankenshipOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. Holmes, L-08-1127 (12-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HurstOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API