Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wolcott v. Celebrezze

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1943No. 29349PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

In support of his answer the respondent contends that he has pleaded facts which show there is no vacancy in the rank of deputy inspector to which the relator can be promoted.

It is admitted that the ordinance of August 31, 1942, increased the number of deputy inspectorships from eight to ten. The respondent alleges that the two newly created positions were filled as of September 1, 1942. Hence, he insists that there is no vacancy to which the relator can be promoted. The relator’s response to this is that in making the two appointments the respondent acted in violation of law and that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Taiclet v. CullOhio Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Devin v. City of HollywoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Morgan v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Gibbons v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Finn v. City of Garfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Hickman v. PortsmouthScioto County Court of Common Pleas · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API