Legal Opinion

Akron National Bank & Trust Co. v. Roundtree

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1978No. 8859PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The Akron National Bank, plaintiff-appellee (hereafter referred to as the Bank), sued the defendant-appellant, Gerald Roundtree (hereafter referred to as Round-tree), to collect the balance due under a cognovit note executed on November 28,1972, for a loan on the purchase of a car. Roundtree defaulted on his loan. The car was repossessed and sold. The cognovit judgment for the balance due, $492.48, taken on April 29, 1976, was set aside on Roundtree’s motion which alleged that the Bank violated the federal Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA). Roundtree claimed no actual damages, but counterclaimed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. William Johnson and Joan Johnson, His Wife, and Cross-Appellees v. McCrackin Ford, Inc., and Ford Motor Credit Company, Inc., and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Wood Acceptance Co. v. KingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Hodges v. Community Loan & Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. James L. Martin v. Commercial Securities Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pacific Concrete Federal Credit Union v. KauanoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Nat'l Blvd. Bk. of Chicago v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Wise Furniture v. DehningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Aetna Finance Co. v. PasqualiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. United Missouri Bank of Kansas City v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API