Legal Opinion

Aetna Finance Co. v. Pasquali

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 20, 1981No. 1 CA-CIV 4440PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

In this case of first impression in Arizona, appellants seek review of the question of whether they may assert a recoupment defense under the Truth-In-Lending Act after the statute of limitations has run for affirmative claims under the Act. We hold that they may not, and therefore affirm the granting of summary judgment for appellee.

In April, 1976, appellants executed a promissory note payable to appellee. Appellants subsequently defaulted and appellee filed a complaint for the balance due on the note alone with costs and attorney’s fees. Appellants’ answer and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Basham v. Finance America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  5. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2009
  2. Duhammel v. StarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. Morris v. Achen Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Kimminau Law Firm, P.C. v. Melody HoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
  5. Lee v. PHH MortgageDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API