Rose v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Vestor Rose (Rose) appeals his jury conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, a class B felony, IND. CODE 35-48-4-2. We affirm.
ISSUES
Rose raises three issues for our review. Restated, the issues are
1. whether the trial court erred in denying Rose's oral motion for change of judge made on the day of trial,
2. whether the court erred in denying Rose's motion to dismiss and motion for continuance, based on a claim the prosecutor interfered with his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel, and
3. whether a State's exhibit was properly…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Randall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Howard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KrausSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Andrews v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Calvert v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Andrews v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.