Legal Opinion

Sturdivant v. Crosby Lbr. & Mfg. Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1953No. 38813PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

The issue is whether on demurrer the declaration can be said to charge that the events combining to cause decedent’s death were reasonably foreseeable by the defendant-actor.

This action was brought in the Circuit Court of Wilkinson County by the widow and six children of William Griffin Sturdivant, deceased. The summary of facts hereinafter made represents those averred in the amended declaration to which a demurrer was sustained. Sturdivant at the time of his death was fifty-eight years of age and was employed by the Crosby Lumber and Manufacturing Company, which operated a large lumber mill…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WoodhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Mauney v. Gulf Refining Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gulf Refining Co. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Paramount-Richards Theatres v. PriceMississippi Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rein v. Benchmark Const. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  2. FOSTER BY FOSTER v. BassMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Matthews v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Langford v. MercurioMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Rolison v. City of MeridianMississippi Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API