Legal Opinion

Mauney v. Gulf Refining Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1942No. 35007PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

The motion denominated a motion for diminution of the record will be treated as a motion to strike certain parts of the record, since it does not suggest that there has been any diminution of the record by omission of necessary pleadings but that certain items are improperly included.

The motion will be sustained as to the following specified items: Nos. &, 10,11,12,13, and 14, being, respectively, motion to dismiss, order on said motion, original appeal bond in former hearing, citation on original appeal, mandate, and former opinion of the court.

Sustained in part and overruled in part.

2Cited by53 opinions

  1. Glover v. Jackson State UniversityMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Rein v. Benchmark Const. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Gulledge v. ShawMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Robinson v. Howard Bros. of Jackson, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Patterson v. Liberty Associates, LPMississippi Supreme Court · 2004

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API