Legal Opinion

Schulz v. Sullivan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1993No. Nos. C-920694, C-920701PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants-appellants Thomas and Mary Sullivan (“the Sullivans”), Panaro Realty, Inc., and Daniel Sullivan appeal from the judgment of the trial court, entered on August 10, 1992, in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, Diane Schulz. In their multiple assignments of error, the appellants claim, in essence, that the evidence adduced at trial failed to establish that the appellants, by failing to disclose to Schulz, orally or in writing, that water had accumulated in the basement of a residence on two occasions, fraudulently induced her to purchase the property.

In 1987, the Sullivans, pursuant to a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Levine v. BeckmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Miller v. BieghlerOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Cincinnati Insurance v. Maytag Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bradford v. B & P Wrecking Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Juan v. Harmon, Unpublished Decision (3-5-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API