Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Elliott

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 6, 1946No. File 16252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

This action is brought under § 1316e of the 1939 Supplement to the General Statutes, to annul a marriage for lack of consent. The plaintiff and defendant, after an all-night round of drinking in New York night clubs, went to Greenwich, Connecticut, where they went through a marriage ceremony before a justice of the peace and immediately thereafter separated without cohabiting.

Neither party is nor was, at the time of the marriage, a resident of or domiciled .in Connecticut. The plaintiff is a resident of the state of New York and the defendant is a resident of the state of California. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  3. Walkinshaw v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. Receivers Middlesex Banking Co. v. Realty Investment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Case v. BushSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pelak v. KarpaConnecticut Superior Court · 1957
  2. Pelak v. KarpaPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API