Pelak v. Karpa
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtSidor, J.
This is a bastardy action brought under § 3208d of the 1955 Supplement to the General Statutes. The complainant and her illegitimate child are residents of the state of New Jersey and were at the time this action was commenced. The defendant has filed a plea in abatement claiming this court has no jurisdiction of this action, because neither the complainant nor her child is domiciled in, or a resident of, Connecticut, and on the further ground that the justice of peace did not bind this action over “to the Court for the County wherein the complainant dwells.”
Two issues are raised: One is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DornesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Hinman v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1817
- Van Epps v. RedfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- State v. TickleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Roy v. PoulinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.