Legal Opinion

Brower v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1910No. Nos. 16,288—(97)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action against defendant company and John P. Klovstad in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $20,750 damages for personal injuries. Prom an order, Dibell, J., overruling the demurrer of defendant Klovstad to the complaint, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The complaint alleges that defendant railway company is organized and engaged in the transportation of interstate commerce, and that appellant, Klovstad, was at the time of the injury hereinafter stated an employee of defendant, and “by and under it given full, direct, immediate and exclusive personal charge, control and supervision of the locomotive engine upon which plaintiff was employed at the time of his injuries, and of its care and management, as well as full authority to direct and control the movements of the *386plaintiff in his work as herein referred to;” that respondent was in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Warax v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
  3. Baird v. ShipmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Ward v. Pullman Car Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  5. Drake v. HaganTennessee Supreme Court · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Zimmer v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Fenrich v. Blake Sch.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  4. Morey v. Shenango Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Berlin v. KoblasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API