Bar-Ram Irrigation Products v. Phenix-Girard Bank, Shalom Irrigation, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:
This diversity suit presents two questions: (1) whether the district court’s finding that the appellant, Phenix-Girard Bank, is liable to the appellee, Bar-Ram Irrigation Products, for failing to secure the signature of the drawee on certain bank drafts is clearly erroneous; and (2) whether and on what basis damages should be assessed if the appellant is liable. We conclude that the trial judge was not clearly in error as to the issue of liability and, thus, we AFFIRM that part of the court’s decision. Since our analysis of the damages question is hampered by incomplete…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Evra Corp. v. Swiss Bank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Marcoux v. Van WykCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Whalen & Sons Grain Co. v. Missouri Delta BankDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1980
- Marcoux v. Mid-States Livestock, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1977
- Bank v. CannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Steege v. Affiliated Bank/North Shore National (In Re Alper-Richman Furs, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Ed Stinn Chevrolet, Inc. v. National City BankOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Fr. Winkler Kg v. Gene Stoller v. Helmut Winkler, Martha Winkler Fuhst, Kurt Maier, Walter Schnee, and Franz Remensberger. Appeal of Gene StollerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- China Worldbest Group Co. v. Empire BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Southland Health Services, Inc. v. Bank of VernonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.