Legal Opinion

South Falls Corporation v. Davenport

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1963No. 16288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Justice.

Petitioners, South Falls Corporation, et al., have applied for a writ of prohibition to stay Honorable F. B. Davenport from requiring petitioners to answer oral interrogatories in accordance with an order of discovery issued pursuant to Rule 737, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

On April 3, 1963, Di-Deb of Texas, Inc. recovered a judgment in a Dallas District Court for $69,642.97 against South Falls Corporation. A writ of execution was issued in an effort to collect the judgment, but was returned by the Sheriff unsatisfied.

On April 25, 1963 plaintiff Di-Deb of Texas, Inc.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Indemnity Insurance v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937
  3. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. State ex rel. CobbTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Sydnor v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Boggess v. HowardTexas Supreme Court · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pelt v. State Board of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. York Division, Borg-Warner Corp. v. Security Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Butler v. Stonewall BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Thompson v. Republic Small Business Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Pelt v. State Board of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API